Ain’t!

I’m going to get right to the point with this title. “Ain’t” is a US English colloquialism that has found its way into Webster’s dictionary. It is slang and until today…I thought it was short for “am not”…”I ain’t going to do that.”

This will be a fragmented story, but I promise to get to the point…eventually.

I am not multi-lingual. Oh…I know enough of several languages to order food, find the bus station, and prevent a face slap, but sadly, I am not multi-lingual. What I am is fascinated with the beauty and depth of the English language and strive to use it fully and properly. Yes, I may be a bit of a snob, but I have little patience for shortcuts in language. “Ain’t” however seems to be a highly energy efficient substitute for a variety of contractions in the English language.

I am helping my sister-in-law redecorate her home. Painting, flooring, color selection, etc. Today we picked colors for her kitchen and breakfast nook (after looking at HUNDREDS of color swatches). The task was simple. One gallon each of two custom blended colors…no problem. We went to a local big-box home improvement store and headed for the paint counter. The woman behind the counter was gruff and seemed to believe that customer service was a “necessary evil”…another story. I showed her the swatches we wanted matched and what type of paint we wanted.

In the course of a 3 three minute conversation she expressed her concerns over paint colors, paint type, decorating ideas, and the necklace my sister-in law was wearing, and in the context of the conversation, she used “ain’t” in place of, will not, have not, is not, am not, and are not.

I concede. If we find a single replacement in our language that consolidates five or more other expressions…who am I to argue?

I’m just saying


17 comments:

Widow_Lady302 said...

Nails on a chalkboard,Ron...Seriously...Nails on a bloody chalkboard that "word" ....Argue next time, for realz...argue!

Ron said...

Bless you Lisa - I thought I may have lost it :)

Simon said...

I use it all the time...damn.

Ron said...

And that is why I love you Simon! :)

Ron

Anonymous said...

The cherry on top of a fun filled day!

;) Jen

Martin said...

I admit, while I am possibly sometimes guilty of such grievances in my use of the English language, I certainly ain't going to disagree with your point.

SugaryCynic said...

Ain't is right up there with irregardless. it hurts me on the inside.

ladyinpurple said...

English is our target language and we rarely use it when we speak. For native speakers, they normally use it. I remembered my teacher when she said that ain't is very informal.

If I had a blog... said...

Hi Jen - Thought you'd get a kick out of that :)

Martin - I know you know better :)

Megan - And "Orientated" is another favorite :)

ladyinpurple - Welcome! Informal is an understatement :) Glad you stopped by.

Ron

Maria said...

'Ain't" may be a US English colloquialism but what is 'irregardless' and 'orientated'? I can tolerate 'ain't' but not the others. Good post! ~M

If I had a blog... said...

Hi Maria - Irregardless and Orientated are...pedestrian substitutes (laziness)for proper english...I ain't kidding :)

Ron

ajpoliquit said...

How uncanny! I had just wondered about the actual meaning of this word on my way home an hour ago. Planned to google it, but saw this post instead, which is so much wittier than anything that Google can cough up. Thanks Ron! :)

If I had a blog... said...

AJ - Good to hear from you! Glad to help with definitions anytime :) Hope you are well.


Ron

Annie (Lady M) x said...

Ah, interesting post. Didn't ain't come from the UK (or am I being Imperialist again?!). It is quite commonly used in the UK too and although it's not as horrible as text speak, it is quite colloquial.

If I had a blog... said...

Hello Annie - Ah...so we can blame God's English for lingual laziness :) Thanks for the heads up :). What other slang shall we credit the Motherland for?

Be well,
Ron

Gill said...

Ain't it interesting eh? ;-)
I hadn't realised that 'word' had so many meanings until you pointed it out! Sadly, I use more than one of them :) oops.

Ron said...

Gill - For you...it is poetic licence :)

Be well,
Ron

Post a Comment